GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 32.6 points higher (43.9 vs 11.3) but costs 5.3× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $45.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when you need intelligence above 11.3, and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) when 11.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 11.3 | −74.3% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 74.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $45.03 | −81.1% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 81.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 14.88s | +33.3% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 33.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 74.3% less intelligence, 81.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/mistral-small-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/mistral-small-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill