GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High)
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 23.2% less intelligence, 540.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 33.7 | −23.2% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 23.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $1,527.49 | +540.4% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 6.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 21.59s | +93.5% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 93.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill