GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 4.2 points higher (48.1 vs 43.9) but costs 7.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1736 vs $239; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 43.9, and GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when 43.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 48.1 | +9.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 9.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $1,735.61 | +627.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 7.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 56.18s | +403.4% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 403.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 9.6% more intelligence, 627.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 403.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill