GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 1.2 points higher (45.1 vs 43.9) but costs 6.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1433 vs $239; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 43.9, and GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when 43.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 45.1 | +2.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 2.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $1,433.35 | +500.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 6.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 26.61s | +138.4% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 138.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 2.7% more intelligence, 500.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 138.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill