GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High)
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 64.5% less intelligence, 177.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 15.6 | −64.5% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 64.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $661.29 | +177.2% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 2.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 21.23s | +90.2% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 90.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill