GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High)
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 42.6% less intelligence, 79.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 314.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 25.2 | −42.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 42.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $427.73 | +79.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 79.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 46.28s | +314.7% Qwen3.7 Plus is 314.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill