GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High)
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 8.4% less intelligence, 1230.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 456.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 40.2 | −8.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 8.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $3,172.37 | +1230.0% Qwen3.8 Max is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 62.08s | +456.3% Qwen3.8 Max is 456.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill