GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 33.1 points higher (43.9 vs 10.8) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $233; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 10.8 | −75.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 75.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $232.95 | −2.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 2.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 8.03s | −28.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 28.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 75.4% less intelligence, 2.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 28.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill