GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs GPT-6 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (High) scores 6.2 points higher (42.4 vs 36.2) but costs 5.3× as much to run the benchmark ($605 vs $115; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (High) when you need intelligence above 36.2, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when 36.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | GPT-6 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 42.4 | +17.1% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 17.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $604.52 | +427.9% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 5.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.80s | 19.02s | +179.7% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 179.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 17.1% more intelligence, 427.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 179.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- GPT-6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)GPT-6 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/gpt-6-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/gpt-6-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill