GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) scores 8.0 points higher (44.2 vs 36.2) but costs 7.5× as much to run the benchmark ($855 vs $115; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 36.2, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when 36.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 44.2 | +22.1% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 22.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $854.60 | +646.2% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 7.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 45.69s | +573.9% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 573.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 22.1% more intelligence, 646.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 573.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/gpt-6-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/gpt-6-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill