GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 6.0 points higher (42.2 vs 36.2) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($1407 vs $115; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 36.2, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when 36.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 42.2 | +16.6% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 16.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $1,406.89 | +1128.5% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 11.57s | +70.6% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 70.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 16.6% more intelligence, 1128.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill