GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) scores 26.9 points higher (36.2 vs 9.3) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($115 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Maverick.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 9.3 | −74.3% Llama 4 Maverick is 74.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $43.98 | −61.6% Llama 4 Maverick is 61.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 10.61s | +56.5% Llama 4 Maverick is 56.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 74.3% less intelligence, 61.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill