GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) scores 31.4 points higher (36.2 vs 4.8) but costs 9.4× as much to run the benchmark ($115 vs $12.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 4.8 | −86.7% Ministral 3 3B is 86.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $12.23 | −89.3% Ministral 3 3B is 89.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 3.29s | −51.5% Ministral 3 3B is 51.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 86.7% less intelligence, 89.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Ministral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill