GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 2.2 points higher (38.4 vs 36.2) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($2003 vs $115; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 36.2, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when 36.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 38.4 | +6.1% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 6.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $2,003.06 | +1649.1% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 17× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 23.09s | +240.6% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 240.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 6.1% more intelligence, 1649.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 240.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill