GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Mistral Small 3.1
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) scores 29.1 points higher (36.2 vs 7.1) but costs 4.1× as much to run the benchmark ($115 vs $27.8; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when you need intelligence above 7.1, and Mistral Small 3.1 when 7.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Mistral Small 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 7.1 | −80.4% Mistral Small 3.1 is 80.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $27.82 | −75.7% Mistral Small 3.1 is 75.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 11.31s | +66.8% Mistral Small 3.1 is 66.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.08 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 80.4% less intelligence, 75.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 66.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Mistral Small 3.1Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill