GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 0.9 points higher (42.2 vs 41.3) but costs 8.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1407 vs $175; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 41.3, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) when 41.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.3 | 42.2 | +2.2% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 2.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $175.20 | $1,406.89 | +703.0% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 8.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.93s | 11.57s | +67.0% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 67.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium): 2.2% more intelligence, 703.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill