GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 3.4 points higher (41.3 vs 37.9) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($175 vs $110; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.3 | 37.9 | −8.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 8.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $175.20 | $109.55 | −37.5% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 37.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.93s | 47.76s | +589.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 589.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium): 8.2% less intelligence, 37.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 589.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill