GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium): 69.2% less intelligence, 33.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 211.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.3 | 12.7 | −69.2% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 69.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $175.20 | $233.56 | +33.3% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 33.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.95s | 21.63s | +211.2% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 211.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill