GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium): 36.6% less intelligence, 564.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 694.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.3 | 26.2 | −36.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 36.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $175.20 | $1,164.93 | +564.9% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 6.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.93s | 55.03s | +694.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 694.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill