GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Max) scores 10.1 points higher (43.6 vs 33.5) but costs 24× as much to run the benchmark ($3658 vs $154; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 33.5, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 33.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Kimi K3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 43.6 | +30.1% Kimi K3 (Max) is 30.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $153.58 | $3,658.07 | +2281.9% Kimi K3 (Max) is 24× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.76s | 48.09s | +611.4% Kimi K3 (Max) is 611.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 30.1% more intelligence, 2281.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 611.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Kimi K3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/kimi-k3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/kimi-k3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill