GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 12.8 points higher (46.3 vs 33.5) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $154; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 46.3 | +38.2% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 38.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $153.58 | $206.66 | +34.6% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 34.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.76s | 46.25s | +584.2% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 584.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 38.2% more intelligence, 34.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 584.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill