GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 4.9 points higher (38.4 vs 33.5) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($2003 vs $154; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 33.5, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 33.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 38.4 | +14.6% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 14.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $153.58 | $2,003.06 | +1204.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.76s | 23.09s | +241.6% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 241.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 14.6% more intelligence, 1204.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 241.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill