GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 11.9% less intelligence, 1179.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 144.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 29.5 | −11.9% Qwen3.7 Max is 11.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $153.58 | $1,964.83 | +1179.4% Qwen3.7 Max is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.76s | 16.53s | +144.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 144.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill