GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 24.8% less intelligence, 178.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 582.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 25.2 | −24.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 24.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $153.58 | $427.73 | +178.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 2.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.76s | 46.10s | +582.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 582.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill