GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 6.7 points higher (40.2 vs 33.5) but costs 21× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $154; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 33.5, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 33.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 40.2 | +20.0% Qwen3.8 Max is 20.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $153.58 | $3,172.37 | +1965.6% Qwen3.8 Max is 21× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.76s | 62.08s | +818.3% Qwen3.8 Max is 818.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 20.0% more intelligence, 1965.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 818.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill