GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 72.5% less intelligence, 164.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 6.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 9.2 | −72.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 72.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $153.58 | $406.68 | +164.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.76s | 6.34s | −6.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 6.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill