GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 9.7 points higher (55.1 vs 45.4) but costs 8.5× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $365; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 45.4, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when 45.4 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.4 | 55.1 | +21.4% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 21.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $364.95 | $3,117.31 | +754.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 8.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.82s | 59.28s | +215.0% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 215.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh): 21.4% more intelligence, 754.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 215.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill