GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) scores 36.1 points higher (45.4 vs 9.3) but costs 8.3× as much to run the benchmark ($365 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.4 | 9.3 | −79.5% Llama 4 Maverick is 79.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $364.95 | $43.98 | −87.9% Llama 4 Maverick is 87.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.82s | 10.48s | −44.3% Llama 4 Maverick is 44.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh): 79.5% less intelligence, 87.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill