GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M2.7
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M2.7 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) scores 22.6 points higher (45.4 vs 22.8) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($365 vs $243; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiniMax-M2.7.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | MiniMax-M2.7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.4 | 22.8 | −49.8% MiniMax-M2.7 is 49.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $364.95 | $243.38 | −33.3% MiniMax-M2.7 is 33.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.82s | 53.78s | +185.8% MiniMax-M2.7 is 185.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
MiniMax-M2.7 vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh): 49.8% less intelligence, 33.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 185.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)MiniMax-M2.7Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/minimax-m2-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/minimax-m2-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill