GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) scores 40.6 points higher (45.4 vs 4.8) but costs 30× as much to run the benchmark ($365 vs $12.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.4 | 4.8 | −89.4% Ministral 3 3B is 89.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $364.95 | $12.23 | −96.6% Ministral 3 3B is 96.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.82s | 3.32s | −82.4% Ministral 3 3B is 82.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh): 89.4% less intelligence, 96.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Ministral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill