GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) scores 5.6 points higher (45.4 vs 39.8) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($365 vs $363; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.4 | 39.8 | −12.3% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 12.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $364.95 | $362.72 | −0.6% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 0.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.82s | 49.36s | +162.3% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 162.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh): 12.3% less intelligence, 0.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 162.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill