GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) scores 22.8 points higher (48.1 vs 25.3) but costs 6.0× as much to run the benchmark ($909 vs $150; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) when you need intelligence above 25.3, and Hy3 when 25.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 25.3 | −47.4% Hy3 is 47.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $909.01 | $150.27 | −83.5% Hy3 is 83.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 139.14s | 33.53s | −75.9% Hy3 is 75.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Hy3 vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Max): 47.4% less intelligence, 83.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill