GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) scores 38.8 points higher (48.1 vs 9.3) but costs 21× as much to run the benchmark ($909 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 9.3 | −80.7% Llama 4 Maverick is 80.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $909.01 | $43.98 | −95.2% Llama 4 Maverick is 95.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 83.46s | 10.61s | −87.3% Llama 4 Maverick is 87.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Max): 80.7% less intelligence, 95.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill