GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) scores 32.5 points higher (48.1 vs 15.6) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($909 vs $661; both premium class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 15.6 | −67.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 67.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $909.01 | $661.29 | −27.3% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 27.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 83.46s | 21.24s | −74.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 74.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Max): 67.6% less intelligence, 27.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill