GPT-6 Astra (High) vs GPT-6 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 3.3 points higher (50.9 vs 47.6) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($2925 vs $1536; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Astra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Sol (Max).
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (High) | GPT-6 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.9 | 47.6 | −6.5% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 6.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,925.01 | $1,535.80 | −47.5% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 47.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 45.44s | 87.14s | +91.8% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 91.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (High): 6.5% less intelligence, 47.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- GPT-6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Astra (High)GPT-6 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/gpt-6-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/gpt-6-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill