GPT-6 Astra (High) vs GPT-6 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 8.5 points higher (50.9 vs 42.4) but costs 4.8× as much to run the benchmark ($2925 vs $605; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (High) when you need intelligence above 42.4, and GPT-6 Sol (High) when 42.4 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (High) | GPT-6 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.9 | 42.4 | −16.7% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 16.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,925.01 | $604.52 | −79.3% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 79.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 70.71s | 22.47s | −68.2% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 68.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (High) vs GPT-6 Astra (High): 16.7% less intelligence, 79.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 68.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- GPT-6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-6 Astra (High)GPT-6 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/gpt-6-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/gpt-6-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill