GPT-6 Astra (High) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 41.6 points higher (50.9 vs 9.3) but costs 67× as much to run the benchmark ($2925 vs $44.0; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (High) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (High) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.9 | 9.3 | −81.7% Llama 4 Maverick is 81.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,925.01 | $43.98 | −98.5% Llama 4 Maverick is 98.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 60.20s | 10.43s | −82.7% Llama 4 Maverick is 82.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Astra (High): 81.7% less intelligence, 98.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6 Astra (High)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill