GPT-6 Astra (High) vs Mistral Large 4 (Medium)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI or Mistral Large 4 (Medium) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-30.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 31.7 points higher (54.8 vs 23.1) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($3204 vs $936; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (High) when you need intelligence above 23.1, and Mistral Large 4 (Medium) when 23.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (High) | Mistral Large 4 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 54.8 | 23.1 | −57.8% Mistral Large 4 (Medi… is 57.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,204.00 | $936.36 | −70.8% Mistral Large 4 (Medi… is 70.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 43.03s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 (Medium) vs GPT-6 Astra (High): 57.8% less intelligence, 70.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Large 4 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.30 for $718.
GPT-6 Astra (High)Mistral Large 4 (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/mistral-large-4-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/mistral-large-4-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill