GPT-6 Astra (High) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 17.2 points higher (50.9 vs 33.7) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($2925 vs $1737; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Astra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (High) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.9 | 33.7 | −33.8% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 33.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,925.01 | $1,737.18 | −40.6% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 40.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 70.71s | 21.27s | −69.9% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 69.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Astra (High): 33.8% less intelligence, 40.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Astra (High)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill