GPT-6 Astra (High) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 24.4 points higher (50.9 vs 26.5) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($2925 vs $283; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (High) when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (High) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.9 | 26.5 | −47.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 47.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,925.01 | $282.51 | −90.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 90.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 59.78s | 6.35s | −89.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 89.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6 Astra (High): 47.9% less intelligence, 90.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Astra (High)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill