GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs gpt-oss-20b (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI or gpt-oss-20b (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Low) scores 36.8 points higher (45.8 vs 9.0) but costs 53× as much to run the benchmark ($1537 vs $28.8; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Low) when you need intelligence above 9.0, and gpt-oss-20b (High) when 9.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | gpt-oss-20b (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.8 | 9.0 | −80.3% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 80.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,536.78 | $28.81 | −98.1% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 98.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.66s | 13.96s | +10.3% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 10.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.05 / $0.22 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
gpt-oss-20b (High) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low): 80.3% less intelligence, 98.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 10.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- gpt-oss-20b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-6 Astra (Low)gpt-oss-20b (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/gpt-oss-20b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/gpt-oss-20b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill