GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Low) scores 36.5 points higher (45.8 vs 9.3) but costs 35× as much to run the benchmark ($1537 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Low) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.8 | 9.3 | −79.7% Llama 4 Maverick is 79.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,536.78 | $43.98 | −97.1% Llama 4 Maverick is 97.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.56s | 10.42s | −17.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 17.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Astra (Low): 79.7% less intelligence, 97.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6 Astra (Low)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill