GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GPT-6 Astra (Low): 1.1% more intelligence, 86.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 306.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.8 | 46.3 | +1.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 1.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,536.78 | $206.66 | −86.6% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 86.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.01s | 48.82s | +306.5% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 306.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Astra (Low)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill