GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 2.3 points higher (48.1 vs 45.8) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $1537; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Astra (Low).
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.8 | 48.1 | +5.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 5.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,536.78 | $2,000.35 | +30.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 30.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.36s | 61.87s | +400.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 400.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low): 5.0% more intelligence, 30.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 400.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Astra (Low)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill