GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Low) scores 30.2 points higher (45.8 vs 15.6) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1537 vs $661; both premium class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.8 | 15.6 | −65.9% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 65.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,536.78 | $661.29 | −57.0% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 57.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.08s | 21.22s | +75.7% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 75.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low): 65.9% less intelligence, 57.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-6 Astra (Low)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill