GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Astra (Low)
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-6 Astra (Low): 12.2% less intelligence, 106.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 420.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.8 | 40.2 | −12.2% Qwen3.8 Max is 12.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,536.78 | $3,172.37 | +106.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.36s | 64.37s | +420.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 420.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-6 Astra (Low)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill