GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Low) scores 36.6 points higher (45.8 vs 9.2) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1537 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Low) when you need intelligence above 9.2, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 9.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.8 | 9.2 | −79.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 79.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,536.78 | $405.10 | −73.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 73.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.63s | 6.44s | −44.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 44.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-6 Astra (Low): 79.9% less intelligence, 73.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6 Astra (Low)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill