GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) scores 5.4 points higher (49.6 vs 44.2) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($2434 vs $855; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 44.2 | −10.9% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 10.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,434.12 | $854.60 | −64.9% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 64.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.72s | 46.01s | +235.3% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 235.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium): 10.9% less intelligence, 64.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 235.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-6 Astra (Medium)GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/gpt-6-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/gpt-6-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill