GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs gpt-oss-20b (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI or gpt-oss-20b (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) scores 40.6 points higher (49.6 vs 9.0) but costs 84× as much to run the benchmark ($2434 vs $28.8; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Medium) when you need intelligence above 9.0, and gpt-oss-20b (High) when 9.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | gpt-oss-20b (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 9.0 | −81.9% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 81.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,434.12 | $28.81 | −98.8% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 98.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.89s | 15.12s | +8.9% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 8.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.05 / $0.22 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
gpt-oss-20b (High) vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium): 81.9% less intelligence, 98.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- gpt-oss-20b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-6 Astra (Medium)gpt-oss-20b (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/gpt-oss-20b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/gpt-oss-20b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill