GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) scores 23.8 points higher (49.6 vs 25.8) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2434 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 25.8 | −48.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 48.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,434.12 | $992.88 | −59.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 59.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.22s | 46.45s | +251.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 251.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium): 48.0% less intelligence, 59.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 251.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-6 Astra (Medium)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill